Over 50,000 hot-selling automation module components.
Allen-Bradley ControlLogix 5570 Guide: 1756-L71 to L75 Models

Allen-Bradley ControlLogix 5570 Guide: 1756-L71 to L75 Models

Mastering Industrial Automation with Allen-Bradley ControlLogix 5570 Controllers

The Allen-Bradley ControlLogix 5570 series by Rockwell Automation remains a cornerstone of modern factory automation. These Programmable Automation Controllers (PACs) bridge the gap between traditional PLC systems and complex DCS environments. At Powergear X Automation, we’ve observed that the 5570 series (1756-L7x) continues to be the “workhorse” for engineers who prioritize reliability and modularity in demanding control systems.

Allen-Bradley ControlLogix 5570 Guide: 1756-L71 to L75 Models

Unlocking Performance: The Core Strength of 1756-L7x Models

The 5570 family delivers significant leaps in processing speed compared to its predecessors. These controllers utilize a high-speed backplane to manage intensive data tasks. Therefore, they excel in industrial automation environments requiring rapid I/O updates. Furthermore, the 1756-L7x series integrates seamlessly with Studio 5000 Logix Designer software. This synergy allows engineers to develop sophisticated code while maintaining high system uptime.

The 1756-L71: Efficiency for Small-Scale Logic

The 1756-L71 serves as the entry point for the 5570 lineup. With 2 MB of user memory, it effectively handles localized machinery or basic factory automation cells. We recommend this model for standalone packaging units or small conveyor systems. It offers a cost-effective path for users migrating from older legacy hardware. However, ensure your tag database remains lean to maximize this controller’s potential.

The 1756-L72 and L73: Balancing Power and Scalability

For mid-sized operations, the 1756-L72 (4 MB) and 1756-L73 (8 MB) are the preferred choices. The 1756-L73, in particular, is a global industry favorite for automotive assembly lines. These models manage increased communication throughput across EtherNet/IP and ControlNet. Moreover, they support more complex motion control profiles. Consequently, they provide the necessary “headroom” for future system expansions without requiring immediate hardware upgrades.

The 1756-L75: High-Capacity Solutions for Large Plants

The 1756-L75 represents the peak of the 5570 series, boasting 16 MB of user memory. It thrives in massive industrial automation projects like oil refineries or power generation plants. This controller handles thousands of I/O points and dozens of motion axes simultaneously. In our experience at Powergear X Automation, the L75 is essential for data-heavy applications involving extensive diagnostic logging and complex interlocking.

Technical Excellence: Shared Features of the 5570 Family

Every controller in this series shares a robust architecture designed for harsh industrial climates. They all fit into standard 1756 ControlLogix chassis, ensuring hardware flexibility.

  • Support for high-speed Integrated Motion over EtherNet/IP.
  • No battery required thanks to energy storage modules.
  • Onboard USB port for easy firmware updates.
  • Advanced security features to protect intellectual property.
  • Seamless integration with FactoryTalk View HMI software.

Strategic Insights: 5570 vs. The Newer 5580 Series

While the newer ControlLogix 5580 series offers embedded gigabit Ethernet, the 5570 series remains highly relevant. Many facilities prefer the 5570 for its proven stability and lower current market price. Additionally, the 5570 is often easier to integrate into existing 1756-based racks without redesigning the entire network. At Powergear X Automation, we suggest the 5570 for maintenance-heavy environments where reliability outweighs the need for raw gigabit speeds.

Real-World Application: The Automotive Assembly Solution

In a recent automotive project, a tier-one supplier utilized the 1756-L73 to coordinate 20 motion axes. The controller managed real-time safety signals and production data simultaneously. By leveraging the 5570’s memory, the plant reduced cycle times by 15%. This scenario proves that choosing the right memory capacity is vital for long-term operational efficiency.

For more technical guides and high-quality automation components, visit the Powergear X Automation website to optimize your facility today.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. How do I decide between an L73 and an L75 for my project?
Focus on your long-term data requirements. If your application involves heavy “Recipe Management” or extensive HMI logging directly on the controller, the 16 MB memory of the L75 is safer. For standard high-speed logic with moderate motion, the L73 usually suffices and saves budget.

2. Can I replace an old L6 series controller with a 5570 model directly?
Yes, the 5570 series is backward compatible with most 1756 chassis. However, you must update your Studio 5000 project to the correct firmware revision. Also, check your power supply capacity, as the L7 series has different power draw characteristics.

3. Does the 5570 series require a battery for program backup?
No. Unlike the older L6 series, the 5570 uses a 1756-ESMC energy storage module. This capacitor-based system eliminates the need for lithium batteries, reducing your long-term maintenance costs and environmental impact.

How to Upgrade to ControlLogix 5570 in Legacy 1756 Racks

How to Upgrade to ControlLogix 5570 in Legacy 1756 Racks

Upgrading Legacy Infrastructure: Installing ControlLogix 5570 Controllers in 1756-A10 Chassis

Upgrading industrial control systems often presents a dilemma between total replacement and incremental modernization. Many engineers ask if the modern ControlLogix 5570 series can function within the aging 1756-A10 chassis. This hardware compatibility is a cornerstone of Rockwell Automation’s “Integrated Architecture” philosophy. At Powergear X Automation, we frequently see facilities successfully breathe new life into old systems using this exact path.

The Technical Evolution of ControlLogix 5570 Series

The 5570 family, including the popular 1756-L71 and 1756-L73 models, represents a massive leap in factory automation power. These controllers utilize the Logix 5000 platform to deliver superior processing speeds and expanded memory capacities. Moreover, they handle complex motion control and high-speed communication better than their predecessors. Transitioning to the 5570 series allows users to leverage modern Studio 5000 features while maintaining a familiar hardware footprint.

Understanding the 1756-A10 Chassis Mechanics

The 1756-A10 serves as a 10-slot foundation for industrial automation modules. This chassis functions primarily as a passive backplane, providing mechanical support and electrical distribution. Since it contains no active logic processing, it remains remarkably versatile across different hardware generations. Consequently, the backplane focuses on routing data signals and power rather than limiting specific controller types.

Seamless Hardware Compatibility and Physical Integration

You can indeed install a ControlLogix 5570 controller into a 1756-A10 chassis without mechanical modifications. Rockwell designed the 1756 module form factor to remain consistent over decades. Therefore, the physical alignment and backplane connectors match perfectly between the new CPU and the legacy rack. This backward compatibility ensures that your existing physical investment remains valuable during a control systems migration.

Critical Pre-Upgrade Checklist for Power and Software

While the physical fit is guaranteed, successful integration requires careful planning of secondary factors. First, evaluate your current power supply, such as the 1756-PA75, to ensure it meets the 5570’s demands. In addition, you must upgrade your programming environment to Studio 5000 Logix Designer. Using outdated RSLogix 5000 versions will prevent you from accessing the advanced features of the L7 series.

Expert Insight: Powergear X Automation Technical Commentary

From our perspective at Powergear X Automation, the 1756-A10 remains one of the most reliable “workhorses” in the industry. However, we suggest checking the age of the backplane itself during the upgrade. If the chassis has been in a high-vibration environment for over 15 years, consider replacing it to prevent intermittent connection issues. Modernizing the CPU is an excellent cost-saving strategy, but the surrounding “passive” hardware must still be robust.

Technical Best Practices for Installation

  • Verify the current draw for the 5570 CPU against the power supply limits.
  • Confirm that all legacy I/O modules have compatible firmware for Studio 5000.
  • Inspect the chassis backplane pins for signs of corrosion or bending.
  • Ensure the enclosure cooling can handle the increased heat from faster processors.
  • Update your system documentation to reflect the new hardware configuration.

Industrial Application Scenario: Food and Beverage Plant

Consider a large bottling facility using legacy 1756-L61 controllers in 10-slot racks. The plant experienced frequent “Watchdog” timeouts due to increasing logic complexity. By swapping only the CPU for a 1756-L73 in the existing 1756-A10 chassis, they reduced scan times by 40%. This approach avoided the massive labor costs associated with rewiring the entire I/O system or replacing the physical enclosure.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can I keep my old 1756-A10 power supply when moving to a 5570 controller?
A: In most cases, yes. However, we recommend calculating the total mA draw of the new CPU and existing I/O modules. Newer CPUs sometimes draw more peak current during startup than older L6 models.

Q: Will my existing 1756-ENBT communication modules work with the new L7 controller?
A: Yes, they will communicate. However, the 5570 series pairs best with 1756-EN2T or EN3T modules to fully utilize the increased backplane data rates.

Q: Do I need to replace the battery when I switch to a 5570 series?
A: The 5570 series uses an 1756-ESMNSE or ESM cap module instead of a traditional lithium battery. This is a major maintenance advantage as it eliminates the need for periodic battery changes.

For more technical guides or to source high-quality ControlLogix components, visit the experts at Powergear X Automation. We provide the parts and expertise to keep your DCS and PLC systems running at peak performance.

Rockwell vs Siemens The Guide to Factory Automation PLCs

Allen-Bradley vs Siemens PLC: Choosing Your Industrial Control System

Two titans dominate the industrial automation landscape: Allen-Bradley (Rockwell Automation) and Siemens.

They both offer robust, scalable, and highly durable control systems that reliably power complex manufacturing plants globally. The real challenge is not about performance—it is determining which ecosystem best aligns with your long-term operational needs. This guide offers a deep dive beyond mere specification lists, providing practical, experience-based insights for real-world plant environments.

The Critical Ecosystem Choice: Why Your PLC Brand Matters

The selection of a core PLC brand dictates your entire factory automation ecosystem. Allen-Bradley (AB) enjoys immense popularity across North America. Many facilities standardized on Rockwell tools decades ago. Consequently, local maintenance teams already know the Studio 5000 environment, which guarantees faster adoption and troubleshooting. Conversely, Siemens stands as a global powerhouse, often the default choice for international Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), particularly in Europe and Asia.

Expert Insight (Powergear X Automation): Choosing a PLC brand commits your facility to that vendor’s software, motor drives, Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs), technical support, and spare parts supply for the next 10 to 15 years. Therefore, selecting a platform that contradicts your existing installed base or local talent pool will certainly inflate lifecycle costs and dramatically slow issue resolution during critical downtime.

Rockwell vs Siemens The Guide to Factory Automation PLCs

Engineering Software Battle: Studio 5000 vs. TIA Portal

The engineering software defines the user experience and development speed.

Allen-Bradley (Studio 5000 / RSLogix 5000): This platform emphasizes ladder logic (LD) and function block diagram (FBD) programming. These are programming languages very familiar to US-based technicians. Moreover, Studio 5000 integrates seamlessly with Rockwell’s FactoryTalk suite for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA), alarming, and data historization. If you currently use PanelView HMIs or FactoryTalk View, maintaining the AB stack avoids toolchain incompatibility.

Siemens (Totally Integrated Automation – TIA Portal): TIA Portal’s key strength is unifying PLCs, safety controllers, drives, and HMIs into one cohesive engineering environment. This platform excels using Structured Text (SCL), and it provides advanced, system-wide diagnostics. As a result, teams managing diverse assets under a single architecture benefit from TIA’s reduction in context-switching and its simplified version control across all devices.

✅ Guidance:
Choose AB if your priority is familiar programming, fast North American onboarding, and leveraging existing Rockwell infrastructure.
Choose Siemens if your team can access the expertise and you require a unified engineering platform for all your control systems components.

Hardware Scale and Network Standards: Matching the Right Controller

Both companies offer scalable hardware that meets various operational needs.

Allen-Bradley: The CompactLogix is a mid-range controller perfect for machine-level control, such as small production lines or standalone packaging cells. The ControlLogix represents the high-end, modular platform designed for plant-wide automation, large I/O counts, and high-speed applications. AB uses native EtherNet/IP, which integrates straightforwardly into common US facility networks.

Siemens: The S7-1200 offers an entry-to-mid-range option, providing a cost-effective choice for OEMs and compact system builds. The S7-1500 is the high-performance, modular PLC, featuring extremely fast processing and comprehensive diagnostics, making it prevalent in the automotive and process industries. Siemens leverages native PROFINET and PROFIBUS, which align well with European-sourced equipment and industrial networks.

Example Application: A small robotic pick-and-place station requires a CompactLogix or an S7-1200. Conversely, a multi-zone assembly line involving complex motion control and integrated safety demands a ControlLogix or an S7-1500 DCS equivalent.

Availability and Lifecycle: The Hidden Cost of Downtime

Component availability is often the most significant factor impacting emergency downtime costs.

Allen-Bradley: In the United States, obtaining AB spare parts quickly is usually easier. This is critical when production downtime costs easily reach thousands of dollars per hour. Resellers consistently stock both legacy and current CompactLogix and ControlLogix units for same-day or next-day shipping.

Siemens: Siemens enjoys broader global availability. However, quickly sourcing older S7-300/400 modules on short notice within North America can sometimes be slow. If your equipment fleet primarily uses European OEMs, Siemens may offer smoother long-term global support, even if a US-based spot-replacement takes longer.

🔧 Practical Recommendation: If minimizing downtime through rapid parts replacement in North America is mission-critical, AB often holds the advantage. If your business operates globally or relies heavily on European machine builders, Siemens provides smoother long-haul global integration.

Cost Analysis: Upfront Price vs. Total Lifecycle Expenditure

It is a common error to focus solely on the initial Purchase Price.

Allen-Bradley: Initial hardware prices are often higher. However, this cost is frequently offset by the extensive local expertise, a robust distributor network, and the faster, well-established US replacement pathways.

Siemens: Siemens hardware often carries a lower initial price tag. Any potential long-term savings, however, heavily depend on your team’s existing skillset and regional parts availability. Retraining costs or slower emergency sourcing can quickly erode any initial hardware savings.

Powergear X Automation advises evaluating the Total Lifecycle Cost (TLC). This calculation must include software licenses, staff training time, inventory for spares, the risk profile of downtime, and vendor response times—not just the CPU unit price.

Quick Comparison: Allen-Bradley vs. Siemens PLCs

FeatureAllen-BradleySiemens
Engineering SoftwareStudio 5000 (US familiar)TIA Portal (Unified platform)
Mid-Range PLCCompactLogixS7-1200
High-End PLCControlLogixS7-1500
Primary NetworkingEtherNet/IPPROFINET/PROFIBUS
StrengthNorth American support, fast onboardingGlobal standardization, unified tooling
Watch-OutsHigher initial price, potential OEM lead timesUS learning curve, legacy NA spare part sourcing

Solutions Scenarios: Which PLC Fits Your Project?

Scenario 1: High-Speed Packaging Line (North America)
Choice: Allen-Bradley ControlLogix or CompactLogix.
Reasoning: Leverage existing local training, use native EtherNet/IP for easier integration with peripherals, and guarantee fast spare part availability to minimize potential $10,000/hour downtime risk.

Scenario 2: New Production Facility (Global Standard)
Choice: Siemens S7-1500 with TIA Portal.
Reasoning: Maintain a global standard across multiple international plants, leverage the unified TIA Portal for engineering consistency across PLCs and drives, and simplify management of complex European-sourced machinery.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) with Experience

  • Q1: Will mixing AB and Siemens controllers save money?
    A: Mixing brands rarely saves money in the long run. While you might save on the initial hardware cost of one unit, you introduce complexity into the support chain. You double your required software licenses, increase training costs for technicians, and complicate your spare parts inventory. The added engineering time and troubleshooting complexity often outweigh any initial savings.
  • Q2: My facility uses an old AB platform (PLC-5). Should I upgrade to AB or switch to Siemens?
    A: If your team is only familiar with legacy Rockwell platforms, upgrading to the ControlLogix/Studio 5000 ecosystem provides the fastest path to modernization. The transition, while significant, is much easier for an experienced technician than switching to an entirely new platform like TIA Portal. The quickest adoption will be with the brand your team already knows.
  • Q3: Is the networking standard (EtherNet/IP vs. PROFINET) a major factor?
    A: Yes, it is a significant factor. While both are modern Ethernet protocols, your choice will influence how easily you connect with other components. If your plant has invested heavily in EtherNet/IP-compatible smart devices (like motor starters or remote I/O), switching to PROFINET will require network gateways, adding a potential point of failure. Conversely, many advanced European robotic and motion systems are optimized for PROFINET. Stick with the network that dominates your facility’s existing infrastructure.

For in-depth analysis of these industrial automation systems and to discover solutions tailored to your specific operational needs, we encourage you to visit the expert platform at Powergear X Automation.

Our team can provide guidance on current in-stock options and safe substitution strategies for critical components.

Back to Top
Product has been added to your cart